Skip to content

Appendix E: Roles & Forums

Status: drafted skeleton · Time: 8 min · Audience: everyone Outcome: Find the role that owns a given topic and the forum where the role’s work happens.

Status: drafted skeleton. The role-to-area mapping, the forum cadence, and the escalation paths are committed. Specific role-to-team and role-to-person assignments live in the program’s tracker (people change; roles do not), not in the playbook. The skeleton densifies as new roles emerge or cadences shift.

The role-level reference for who owns what across the program. The playbook uses role names throughout (cohort lead, security review owner, platform team, design system leads, etc.); this appendix is where the roles are defined and where the forums those roles operate in are catalogued.

The discipline:

  • No personal names. People change roles; roles persist. Personal names live in the program’s tracker.
  • No specific channel handles. Channel handles change as the program scales; this appendix names the forum’s purpose and points at Appendix F for the channel directory.
  • Cadence and authority are explicit. A reader should be able to tell at a glance how often a forum meets and what kinds of decisions it makes.

The current set of named roles, the area each owns, and the forums where the role operates.

RoleAreaPrimary forumCadence
Program leadOverall program direction; cohort scheduling; sponsor liaisonProgram flagship channelContinuous async; weekly office hours
SponsorExecutive backing for the programProgram flagship channel; quarterly sponsor syncQuarterly
Cohort leadBelt cohort scheduling, evidence review, escalationCohort channel per cohortCohort cadence (typically biweekly cohort sync)
Design transformation leadDesign-track curriculum and toolingDesign-system channelContinuous async; monthly design transformation sync
Compass plugin ownerPlugin distribution, version management, hook policiesPlugin maintenance channelContinuous async
Enablement Stack co-authorsThe 9-layer enablement stack model and its evolutionCross-functional syncQuarterly review
Blade design-system leadsBlade component contributions, design system evolutionDesign-system channel; Blade contribution PRsContinuous async
Cross-POD signal forum facilitatorsCross-team patterns, embed coordination, office hours rotationCross-POD signal forumMonthly rotation
Builder Day operationsBuilder Day scheduling, logistics, validation gatesProgram flagship channel; Builder Day prep channelPer-event
Claude workspace access ownerProvisioning Enterprise and Team seats, migrations, audit, admin controlsAccess management channelContinuous async
LiteLLM gateway / model billingLiteLLM gateway ownerInfrastructure channelContinuous async; monthly cost review
Slash engineering leadSlash internal AI copilot evolutionSlash engineering channelContinuous async
Blade connector teamBlade MCP connector maintenanceDesign-system channelContinuous async
Figma connector teamFigma MCP connector maintenanceDesign-system channelContinuous async
Security review ownerSecurity review intake, threat modelling, plugin security reviewSecurity review escalation channelContinuous async; weekly review session
Council chair (rotating)Annual charter revision, monthly Council session, leadership liaisonCouncil working forumMonthly Council session; annual charter revision; quarterly leadership liaison
Council leadership liaison (rotating)Quarterly interface with engineering leadership on technical directionQuarterly leadership liaisonQuarterly

The “primary forum” column points at the kind of channel; the actual channel handles are catalogued in Appendix F.

The forums that recur on a cadence, with their purpose.

The primary asynchronous channel for the program. Onboarding announcements, cross-cohort updates, escalation routing, celebrations. Most builders operate here as their primary playbook-related surface.

  • Cadence: continuous async.
  • Owners: program lead.
  • Decisions made here: scheduling and announcements; not technical decisions.

The Staff+ Council’s primary decision-making meeting. RFC sponsorship, membership invitations, Council-shaped questions raised by the working forum.

  • Cadence: monthly, 60 minutes, with mandatory pre-reads.
  • Owners: the rotating Council chair.
  • Decisions made here: RFC commits, Council membership invitations.
  • See: C.2 — Structure.

The Layer 2 senior-IC forum. Active members reviewing RFCs in flight, surfacing cross-team alignment topics.

  • Cadence: biweekly, 60-90 minutes.
  • Owners: the rotating Council chair.
  • Decisions made here: items surfaced to the monthly Council session; not direct decisions.

The Council’s structured interface with engineering leadership.

  • Cadence: quarterly, 30-45 minutes.
  • Participants: the rotating Council liaison; the CTO or VP-Eng.
  • Decisions made here: technical-direction views surfaced to leadership; not directive.

The Council’s full review of the past year.

  • Cadence: annual, half-day session.
  • Owners: the year’s outgoing chair.
  • Decisions made here: charter version bump, membership review, the year’s reading list.

The cohort lead’s recurring meeting with cohort members.

  • Cadence: typically biweekly, varies by cohort.
  • Owners: cohort lead.
  • Decisions made here: evidence review, escalation, cohort-level scheduling.

The propagation forum at multiple levels of the program. Black Belts run office hours per B.12. Council members run them per C.2.

  • Cadence: weekly per host; rotating.
  • Owners: the host.
  • Decisions made here: in-flight blocker resolutions; not policy decisions.

The existing API Council that reviews API designs against the API Design Guide. The AI-specific lens is covered in B.15.

  • Cadence: continuous async with periodic synchronous sessions.
  • Owners: API Council leads.
  • Decisions made here: API design verdicts (Red/Amber/Green) on submissions.

The program-wide hands-on event.

  • Cadence: quarterly or as scheduled.
  • Owners: program lead and Builder Day operations.
  • Decisions made here: programmatic; the event itself is the surface.

When something is broken, where does the escalation go.

SymptomFirst contactIf unresolved
Setup or environment brokenProgram flagship channelCohort lead
Plugin install or update brokenPlugin maintenance channelCompass plugin owner
Skill failing in productionThe skill’s owner team channelPlugin maintenance channel
MCP connector failingThe connector’s owner teamPlugin maintenance channel
Security concern (regulator-protected data)Security review escalation channel directlySecurity review owner
LLM gateway failingInfrastructure channelLiteLLM gateway owner
Cohort scheduling or evidence questionCohort leadProgram lead
Cross-team disagreementEmbedded sprint or office hoursCouncil working forum
Architectural question that affects multiple teamsRFC pipelineCouncil monthly session

Why this appendix is a skeleton at first publish

Section titled “Why this appendix is a skeleton at first publish”

The role-to-area mapping is committed; the standing forum list is committed; the escalation paths are committed. What remains soft:

  • The specific channel handles per forum (catalogued in Appendix F and likely to evolve as the program scales).
  • The role-to-person assignments (live in the program’s tracker; people change).
  • The exact cadence numbers in some cases (e.g., cohort cadence varies by cohort lead’s preference).

The skeleton is honest about what is stable and what evolves. As the program runs, the skeleton densifies through Appendix F (channels) and the program’s tracker (people).


This appendix ships as a drafted skeleton. The role-to-area mapping and the forum cadence are stable; specific channel handles and role-to-person assignments live in the program’s tracker. Expected revision cadence: with each annual Council charter revision, plus on-demand when new roles emerge.